<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bebedoll | york | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://bebe-doll.net/members/york/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bebe-doll.net/members/york/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning york.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:20:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=6.1.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">53dbec74584b8f7cbc3619c4d353ad90</guid>
				<title>mary replied to the topic NHS in crisis in the forum Chit chat</title>
				<link>http://bebe-doll.net/forums/topic/nhs-in-crisis/#post-444</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:51:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://bebe-doll.net/members/york/' rel="nofollow">@york</a> you are talking about the kind of care that would have been provided by family and often still is. I don&#8217;t get the argument that the general tax payer should pay more tax so that the family can be off doing something else while preserving their inheritance. Do you see no responsibility on the part of a family which has the funds/time to look&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-381"><a href="http://bebe-doll.net/forums/topic/nhs-in-crisis/#post-444" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>